After watching the opening night premiere of the 2000 Mules movie in my hometown of Orange Park, Florida, I was left wondering – yet again – why haven’t criminal investigations been conducted and acknowledged, why haven’t special sessions been demanded by legislators in the five states at issue (Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania), and why don’t we already have decertifications of their 2020 elections?
I mean . . . the data doesn’t lie, the video doesn’t lie, both are easily documented and verified and cross-checked, in fact, done so thoroughly that ultimately the profile of an easily knowable individual can be produced with great confidence – right?
Plus, some of them will obviously be Black Lives Matter and Antifa wrongdoers – right?
I mean, 10 *trillion* signals were said to be purchased, and 4 *million* minutes of surveillance video were compiled, all by patriotic Americans in an effort to expose saboteurs subverting democracy under the pretense of protecting it.
Yes, I’m a true believer in MAGA / MEGA. Count me among the guilty as charged. And proud of it.
Unsurprisingly, I left the 2000 Mules movie with one primary thought in mind: this is a checkmate from which our adversaries cannot recover. So much of a checkmate it seriously calls into question two equal parts: state legislature *INACTION* as well as state-based law enforcement inaction.
So what the hell is going on here?
Well, I want to set the table for this opinion piece by sharing a recent text exchange I had with a friend. He has lived and worked most of his adult life in the Peach State. He’s a rock-solid guy who loves his country. Like most of us, he’s extremely concerned by the foolishness we’ve been forced to endure . . . but I don’t think he realizes (just as I previously didn’t) how badly we’ve been infiltrated and betrayed.
Here's an approximation of our recent exchange after I viewed the movie, expressed my anger directed at the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, and he (for good reasons) defended GBI’s leadership and the agency in general.
J.B.:
The leftwing has played a lawfare game, my man, hiding behind technicalities. It's not going to protect them. Like many, I'm tired of the bullshit.
The wonder to me, and many around the nation I'm sure, is this -- what the [****] were the GBI's lawyers and leadership doing when the state constitution was being flouted, when the Governor was exceeding his constitutional authority, when the Secretary of State went rogue, when Stacy Abrams was trampling all about creation setting up her criminal enterprise?
When the [****] did all of Georgia become passive pussies afraid of Stacy Freaking Abrams ???
Does the GBI *not* know how to be pro-active? If not the institution itself, what about the individual GBI officers? Do they not have a duty to uphold the state constitution?
Friend:
We are on the same side on that election, I am just letting you know the reality of criminal investigations from my experience.
To that end, GBI is not a state police and has no legal authority to unilaterally involve itself.
Most people do not know this, but the GBI is authorized by law only as an assisting agency. It is without original jurisdiction and cannot initiate criminal investigations without being requested by a statutorily designated official having jurisdiction over the crime at issue, i.e. sheriff, police chief, DA, and some judges.
That said, the Governor can direct it to investigate, hence the criticism of him.
I can tell you that I would be wary of getting the GBI involved in election issues. It risks damaging its credibility as we have seen with the politicization of the FBI.
The secretary of state has jurisdiction over elections and has investigators. In my view he is the one that caused this election chaos with by caving to the whole mailing out ballots initiative.
J.B.:
Bruh, I'm just venting. I know you know that but . . . we as individual Americans have failed in our job to one another. The Sheriff of Cobb or Gwinnett counties could have easily invited the GBI in and monitored those drop boxes, damn the Governor *or* the Secretary of State.
Anyway, the days of passivity are over. Law enforcement is a *very* difficult job, we all know that. But the GBI leadership, unless they're participating in this sting, are in deep, deep trouble.
A world-historic RICO prosecution is surely coming and Georgia looks -- to me, anyway -- to be Exhibit A.
Imagine how pleased I was to see in the days that immediately followed my friendly text exchange, General Michael Flynn posted a very strong challenge for all of America to see that is directly applicable to the multiplicity of questions raised by the 2000 Mules movie.
No more damn excuses !!!
Toward that end, it’s high time we take a quick look at Georgia and the primary reason why the time for First Sovereigns to act in Georgia. And by act, I don’t mean simply requesting action but demanding it now.
My particular focus for now is Vic Reynolds, the current head of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. He is not only a former District Attorney of Cobb County (one of the four large metropolitan counties of the Atlanta region) but he also formerly served as a police officer *and* as the former Chief Magistrate Judge of Cobb County. He knows the duties of public service and he’s quite familiar with the oath a law enforcement officer must take.
He knows sheriffs are the chief law enforcement officer in their county and slaves to no one.
No one.
Unless they choose to be that slave.
He also knows the Georgia Bureau of Investigation is not limited in any *real* way when it comes to investigating crimes in the State of Georgia. One conversation with a sheriff, practically any Georgia sheriff in fact, is all it takes.
So . . . when the President of the United States publicly says, loudly and repeatedly, mail-in ballots allow for rampant cheating, isn’t it the duty of law enforcement officers everywhere in this nation to be on alert for this sort of crime that strikes at the heart of our fundamental rights. The very heart of our constitutional rights?
Further, isn’t it the duty of law enforcement officers to not only be on alert against such an incredible crime but to be directly guarding against organized election fraud in furtherance of criminal activity?
After all, who is the chief law enforcement officer of the nation?
That’s right, it’s the President of the United States.
When CNN, headquartered in Atlanta itself, reports this quote by President Donald Trump on Friday, April 10, 2020:
“Mail ballots, they cheat. People cheat,” Trump said Tuesday, when asked if states should expand absentee voting during the pandemic. “Mail ballots are very dangerous thing for this country because they’re cheaters. They go and collect them. They’re fraudulent in many cases.”
aren’t we allowed as taxpayers in the Great State of Georgia (my family owns property in Macon and Sumter Counties) to expect the chief law enforcement officers in the largest metropolitan area of the Peach State, along with the GBI, to not only be on alert with respect to fraudulent activities but to be pro-active in protecting the vote of all Georgia citizens?
With the President, as chief executive of the Executive branch and chief law enforcement officer of the nation, it naturally follows that the Governor of Georgia is the chief law enforcement officer in his state. Because we have dual governmental sovereigns, however, and we as citizens are First Sovereigns, it goes without saying that the level of government closest to us is most often Second Sovereign.
That means the federal government, in most cases applicable to most citizens, is merely our Third Sovereign.
Thus, no Georgia sheriff needs authorization from the Governor or the Georgia Legislature to investigate allegations of vote fraud. A crime is a crime and they are authorized under the Georgia constitution to investigate it. Likewise, no director of the GBI needs authorization from the Georgia Legislature to assist sheriffs in their investigation of allegations of vote fraud.
This recent kabuki theater they’ve engaged in, where the state legislature and the Governor have played as if new laws were needed in Georgia to even approach the subject of organized crime engaging in criminal election fraud, is absurd.
The sheriffs and the GBI already had all the authority they needed to investigate organized crime. Notice how they didn’t apply this kind of duplicitous particularity (no explicit authority to independently investigate these specific crimes) to the situation where neither the Governor nor the Secretary of State had explicit authority to specifically rewrite Georgia election laws.
Right?
This kind of nonsense was repeated across the nation, and legislature after legislature went along with it.
The question that must be asked is: why?
I can’t help but wonder if Vic Reynolds recognizes his responsibility, his duty, as a First Sovereign?
An American’s responsibility of citizenship is owed first, in this earthly realm, to each of us as individual First Sovereigns and, importantly, then and only then to the state and to the nation. Our responsibilities are only enhanced when accepting a position of public service. That enhancement goes through the roof when your public position includes a leadership spot within senior management of government, or the title of agency head or chief executive.
I seem to keep harping on this next assertion but . . . Duty is something the legal process has manipulated and warped into some kind of unknowable and unaccountable concept.
That’s bullshit.
Your mileage may vary but I am personally offended when I read a letter such as that provided by Vic Reynolds in October 2021. Here is just one offensive snippet:
Of those datapoints, the spreadsheets identify 279 cellphones which had made multiple trips to within 100 feet of a voter drop box. Other spreadsheets and documents provided tie these cell phones through geolocation to various organizations. What has not been provided is any other kind of evidence that ties these cell phones to ballot harvesting;
What !?!
Any *other* kind of evidence.
Ballot harvesting !?!
So, is Vic Reynolds putting forward the proposition that True The Vote has the duty to fully investigate election fraud, wrap it up in a bow, and deliver it on high to the GBI for their perusal?
Really?
When a treasonous crime is suspected, and well-documented evidence of said treasonous crime is presented to a responsible law enforcement agency, it is the duty of that agency to investigate said crime. Whether that’s the FBI, the GBI, or the Cobb County sheriff.
Period.
“Let me put it this way, cocaine traffickers have been convicted on a lot less.” This was said at the 19:39 mark of this linked video by Robert Barnes. He was commenting upon the outrageous dismissal of the compiled True The Vote evidence and said it in a recent overview of the 2000 Mules movie. It was posted by David Freiheit on his YouTube channel, Viva CLIPS! and it was part of a much longer presentation they jointly made on his Viva Frei YouTube channel.
So, if many felonious acts have been charged and successfully convicted on less evidence than that compiled by True the Vote, and they absolutely have been, why in the hell have we been forced to stomach extreme passivity in Georgia when it comes to election fraud in November 2020 and January 2021 ???
I’ll repeat an earlier assertion I made in this opinion piece. If Vic Reynolds isn’t part of Team Trump’s sting operation, he’s in deep trouble when this future RICO prosecution is fully revealed.
As far as I’m concerned, every single sheriff in the state of Georgia needs to be put on record RIGHT FREAKING NOW with respect to these two questions:
[1] Are you or are you not demanding – in writing – that the Georgia Bureau of Investigation assist you and other sheriffs to investigate allegations of organized criminal activity surrounding the November 2020 elections *and* the January 2021 special election?
[2] Are you or are you not demanding – in writing – that the Georgia Bureau of Investigation assist you and other sheriffs, along with the state legislature, in investigating allegations of infiltration by foreign agents and entities surrounding the November 2020 elections *and* the January 2021 special election, to include illegal acts up to and including treason by certain state and federal public officers and private American citizens?
Mind you, it is illegal for the chief executive of a state and any of his or her agency heads to abrogate to themselves an authority only conferred by the Georgia constitution to the state legislature.
Damn what they might have thought, damn what faulty legal opinion they may have relied upon, damn what they insisted emergencies may have supposedly required.
Damn all of that shiznit.
It is illegal and barred by the Georgia Constitution.
It’s time to make the state legislature do its job.
It’s time to make the sheriffs do their job.
But it’s also time for the citizens of Georgia to get up off of their asses.
If your sheriff won’t meet the requirements of the job on these historic questions, you as a First Sovereign have the right to demand they do so. Hell, file a warrant application with your Chief Magistrate Judge in your county if you have to.
Put the closest elected official to you, and that’s the Magistrate Judge, on notice. You suspect statewide crimes have been committed during the November 2020 and January 2021 elections, perhaps in your county. John and Jane Does 1 through 242 in the True the Vote database are the perpetrators and knowable to law enforcement through diligent investigation.
Georgia has a specific Warrant Application procedure when non-law enforcement litigants seek the arrest of other persons. But for what appears to be an incredible lack of fidelity to the state and federal constitutions, participants in organized criminal activity surrounding the 2020 November elections and the 2021 special election in Georgia would have been easily identified through a well-established data mining process utilized by law enforcement for years and years.
Certain facts are known. The database compiled by TrueTheVote exists, the FBI and the GBI are in receipt of said database, these already-compiled John and Jane Does 1 through 249 compiled from activity in Georgia remain loose in the nation and quite probably within the state. Justice requires they be specifically identified through common and readily available data mining processes, thereafter investigated and, where applicable and appropriate, prosecuted.
The procedure for such warrant applicants is set by the Chief Magistrate and may involve direct contact between a litigant and a judge in an ex parte fashion.
The applicable provision in the Georgia Code (O.C.G.A. §17-4-40) is as follows:
25.3. Private Citizen Warrant Application Hearings
A. Upon the filing of an application for an arrest warrant by a person other than a peace officer or law enforcement officer, and if the court determines that a hearing is appropriate pursuant to OCGA § 17-4-40, the court shall give notice of the date, time and location of the hearing to the applicant and to the person whose arrest is sought by personal service or by first class mail to the person’s last known address or by any other means which is reasonably calculated to notify the person of the date, time and location of the hearing.
B. At the warrant application hearing the court shall:
a. Explain the probable cause purpose of the hearing;
b. Inform the accused of the charges;
c. Inform the accused of the right to hire and have the advice of an attorney, of the right to remain silent, and that any statement made may be used against him or her.
C. The warrant application hearing shall be conducted in accordance with OCGA § 17-4-40 (4) and (5) and Rule 25.2(C) of these rules.
D. A copy of the record of any testimony and the proceedings of the warrant application hearing, if available, shall be provided to the proper prosecuting officer and to the accused upon payment of the reasonable cost for preparation of the record.
E. The judge conducting a warrant application hearing is without jurisdiction to make final disposition of the case or cases at the hearing by imposing any fine or punishment.
It’s time to shake the tree, ladies and gentlemen. It doesn’t matter that you don’t have personal knowledge of a specific individual. It doesn’t matter that the situation doesn’t perfectly fit a warrant application. What matters is your heartfelt feeling that a crime has been committed and you see no evidence of law enforcement following up on the crime and investigating it where sufficient suspicion has been raised, you have been made aware of a knowledge-enhancing database, and common sense tells you a crime has been committed.
Here's the context you have to make clear to your local public servants.
If a ballot doesn't strictly comply with the law in terms of who voted, and how they voted, and how the vote was processed – remember, STRICT COMPLIANCE – it's an illegal ballot.
Period.
You don't have to prove fraud, you don't have to prove anybody intended to defraud anybody, it's an illegal ballot. Period, end of story.
This is why Vic Reynold’s letter was so offensive.
Any *other* kind of evidence, indeed.
He shifted all kinds of burdens. To me, that’s quite suspicious. Here’s another reason I was so offended by that letter from Reynolds. An opinion piece titled Buying Data and the Fourth Amendment by Orin Kerr. He’s a Professor at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law:
Can governments purchase user records as an end-run around the warrant requirement imposed by Carpenter v. United States? As a matter of Fourth Amendment law, the answer is “yes.” Companies have common authority over their business records. Common authority allows companies to consent to a government search of their databases even when their users oppose it. A voluntary sale manifests consent, permitting the government to buy access to Carpenter-protected records without a warrant or cause. Arguments exist for why a different rule may be justified someday. But for now, and for the foreseeable future, Fourth Amendment law permits buying business records even if users have rights in those records.
So . . . you say you need a specific warrant, Vic?
Are you sure? Are you absolutely certain about that, Mr. Director ???
Where a sheriff or law enforcement agency head refuses to do the job required of the office, the initial recourse for a First Sovereign in Georgia is to start documenting the unreasonable inaction. Force every public servant up the local chain all the way to the state legislature to have knowledge of the issue and the odd lack of responsiveness to the national threat. Including *their* odd lack of responsiveness. Deny them the plausible deniability they desire.
One sure way to deny them said plausible deniability is through local action. There are reportedly an incredible 159 counties in the state of Georgia (as a means of comparison, Florida has just 67).
A whopping *69* of the 159 counties have populations LESS THAN 20,000. That is approximately 43.4 percent of all Georgia counties.
That's also 69 constitutional officers (sheriffs) who should be easily accessible.
That's 69 sheriffs (at a minimum -- in fact, this applies to all 159 chief law enforcement officers in these Georgia counties) who *should* have been paying attention to the chief law enforcement officer in this nation when he highlighted the mail-in ballot issue.
First Sovereigns in these Georgia counties need to put something in writing to these constitutional officers. Make it a communication demanding they do their job and investigate these perpetrators of crimes in Georgia, crimes committed against all American citizens.
Election fraud crimes have been committed against every First Sovereign in Georgia. The perpetrators, whether private citizens or government employees *must* be held accountable.
Demands should be made of town councils, city councils, and mayors that they support the prompt and thorough review of the True The Vote database and any subsequent investigations reasonably arising from their data.
In support of this mindset, an American mindset, General Flynn has thrown down the gauntlet. It’s time for these suckers to shit or get off the damn pot.
To further drive the point home, General Flynn recently posted a Brendon Dilley submission:
To which, America’s General added these words:
So let’s not go “broke and hungry.” Get involved and stop talking about it. Local Action means to follow a new path in life by getting involved in your communities in a far different capacity than ever before. No more excuses about “those dirty politicians”, we put them there and allowed them to stay forever.
Local Action requires people to step up and volunteer for local political campaigns, it may mean for some to run for political office, it may mean for others to challenge your local officials at school boards or county commission hearings when it comes to the filth they’re forcing down our children’s throats or the third world election systems we have.
No more excuses folks, it’s time to get involved. Read the Declaration of Independence, the bill of rights, the constitution and realize what we have been handed and what we stand to lose.
EVERYTHING!!!
Choose new candidates for every office bottom to top. We can’t do any worse with what we already have.
Local Action = National Impact 🙏🏼🇺🇸
To conclude:
Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming.
MAGA / MEGA
The Gathering of Sovereigns, Part 7
I live in Hall County Georgia. We just moved here and didn’t vote here in 2020. Can I still demand this if I didn’t vote in the election here and do I have to do it in writing or I do I just walk into Hall County Sheriff office and make demands...I’m kind of tired of waiting on someone to fix this for us!
Great writing JB!! This needs to be spread far and wide in Georgia! Can I share on my Twitter feed?? (SailingMom728)